Northstarself
PERSONAL VALUES · SCHWARTZ PVQ-RR

Free Personal Values Test

What matters most to you in life? Fifty-seven questions, about ten minutes, from Shalom Schwartz's Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire — your order of 19 values, relative to each other, not to anyone else.

What a personal values test measures

A personal values test measures which broad life goals a person treats as most and least important. This test administers Shalom Schwartz's 57-item Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire (PVQ-RR), which scores 19 values and four higher-order values. Scores are centered on each person's own mean rating, so they describe priorities, not levels compared with others.

Values are the goals people use to decide what is worth doing. Shalom Schwartz's theory, tested in dozens of countries, holds that the same basic values appear everywhere and differ only in how people rank them — and that they sit on a circle, where neighbours are compatible and opposites pull against each other.

Four higher-order values, nineteen narrow ones

The refined theory divides the circle into 19 values, each measured by three items, which group into four higher-order values. Humility and face sit on the borders and are reported on their own.

Openness to change

Independence of thought and action, novelty, and enjoying life — following your own interests in uncertain directions.

Self-direction — thought · Self-direction — action · Stimulation · Hedonism

Self-enhancement

Personal success, and power over people and resources — pursuing your own standing.

Achievement · Power — dominance · Power — resources

Conservation

Security, conformity, and tradition — preserving order, stability, and what has come before.

Security — personal · Security — societal · Tradition · Conformity — rules · Conformity — interpersonal

Self-transcendence

Care for the people close to you and for the welfare of everyone and of nature — looking beyond your own interests.

Universalism — nature · Universalism — concern · Universalism — tolerance · Benevolence — caring · Benevolence — dependability

Priorities, not levels

Some people agree with almost every item; others with very few. The questionnaire's authors therefore instruct that each value be centered on the person's mean rating across all 57 items, and this test does exactly that. Your scores show what matters more and less to you — never how you compare with anyone else, and no percentile is computed.

What is free and what the report adds

Your four higher-order values, how you resolve the two oppositions, and your three highest values are free, along with the methodology and sources. The advanced report adds the other sixteen values, compares your hierarchy with the typical one across 49 countries, reads humility, face, and your lowest priorities, and includes a 90-day practice and an AI reflection module.

The limits worth knowing

Values are what you say matters, and they predict behaviour only loosely. Three items per value is not much: self-direction thought, achievement, security-personal, and especially humility were measured less reliably in the source study, and small gaps between two narrow values are noise. The four higher-order values are the most dependable part of the result.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Personal values questions, answered

What does this personal values test measure?

It measures how important 19 broad life goals are to you relative to each other — values such as self-direction, stimulation, achievement, security, tradition, benevolence, and universalism. Everyone holds all of them; what differs between people is the order. The result shows your order, grouped into four higher-order values: openness to change, self-enhancement, conservation, and self-transcendence.

Why are my scores shown as plus and minus numbers?

Because the questionnaire's authors instruct that each value be centered on the person's mean rating across all 57 items. People use a response scale differently — some agree with almost everything — and centering removes that, leaving priorities. A positive score means the value matters more to you than your values do on average; a negative one, less. It is never a comparison with other people.

Is a low-ranked value a bad thing?

No. A low-ranked value is not a flaw and not something you oppose. Values compete — pursuing one often costs another — so a low rank describes what you are most willing to trade away when something has to give. Schwartz's theory treats every value as legitimate.

Why do I choose “he” or “she” before starting?

The PVQ-RR describes people of the respondent's own gender, so it is published in a male and a female form whose items differ only in pronouns. You choose the wording you would like to read. Scoring is identical for both, and the choice is not part of your result or your share link.

How is this different from the work values test?

Work values ask what a job must offer for you to find it worth doing, using the O*NET Work Importance Locator. Personal values are broader life goals that apply across work, relationships, and everything else. The two are scored independently and never combined.

How reliable are the results?

Each of the 19 values rests on three items. Across 49 cultural groups the values averaged a reliability (alpha) of .70, but self-direction thought, achievement, security-personal, and especially humility (.47) were weaker, and the result flags them. The four higher-order values were reliable in every group. Small differences between two narrow values are not treated as meaningful.

SOURCES

Where this test comes from

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    Schwartz, S. H., & Cieciuch, J. (2022). Measuring the refined theory of individual values in 49 cultural groups: Psychometrics of the Revised Portrait Value Questionnaire. Assessment, 29(5), 1005–1019. ↗

    Open access. The six-point response scale, the definitions of the 19 values, their reliabilities across 49 groups (mean alpha .70; humility .47), and Table 5's median centered values, used here as the typical hierarchy.

  3. [3]
    Schwartz, S. H., & Cieciuch, J. PVQ-RR questionnaires and scoring instructions, Open Science Framework. ↗

    The files this implementation reproduces: the English male and female forms, the Simplified Chinese version, the scoring key for 19 and four higher-order values, and the instructions for centering on each person's mean rating.

  4. [4]
    Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). ↗

    An open-access introduction to the value circle: what values are, why neighbouring values are compatible and opposing ones conflict.