What your team's mix contains — and what it doesn't
A group that shares a preference is fast and comfortable, and blind in the same direction. The more useful output is usually the opposite: a preference nobody on the team holds is the thing nobody will raise by instinct.
This describes a mix of stated preferences. It does not measure capability, does not predict team performance, and there is no research supporting the use of four-letter types to select, assign, promote, or evaluate anyone. Used that way it is both unfair to individuals and a legal risk to an employer. Use it to start a conversation about how the group works, and nothing more.
Add the types on your team
Add a type once per person — two ISTJs means adding ISTJ twice. Nothing is saved or sent anywhere.
Nobody added yet.
Add at least two people to see the composition.
Comparing exactly two people? The pair comparison goes into more depth on each preference. Nobody knows their type yet? Start with the free test.