Northstarself
WORK VALUES · O*NET® WIL

Free Work Values Test

Based on the U.S. Department of Labor's O*NET Work Importance Locator. Sort twenty cards to rank what a job has to give you — pay, autonomy, recognition, colleagues, management, security — before you would call it a good one.

The six work values

Work values describe what a person needs from a job in order to find it satisfying, as distinct from what activities they enjoy. This test administers the O*NET Work Importance Locator, a twenty-card sort published by the U.S. Department of Labor, which ranks six work values: Achievement, Independence, Recognition, Relationships, Support, and Working Conditions. Its scores are ipsative — they rank a person's values against each other, not against other people.

The theory behind the instrument is the Theory of Work Adjustment: satisfaction comes from the fit between what a person needs from work and what the work gives back. Each of the six values below is measured by three or more specific needs, and every one of the twenty cards you sort belongs to exactly one of them.

Achievement

· Doing work you are good at

You want work that uses what you are actually good at and gives you the sense of having accomplished something. Results matter to you more than the conditions around them.

Independence

· Deciding how the work gets done

You want room to make your own decisions, try your own ideas, and plan your own work. The method matters to you as much as the outcome.

Recognition

· Advancement, standing, and credit

You want your work to be seen and to lead somewhere — advancement, responsibility over others, and credit that is actually attributed to you.

Relationships

· Colleagues, service, and staying straight

You want colleagues you get along with, work that is of service to other people, and never to be pushed into something that conflicts with your own sense of right and wrong.

Support

· Management that backs you up

You want to be treated fairly by the organisation, trained properly, and backed by supervisors who will stand behind their people. You are asking about the management, not the work.

Working Conditions

· Pay, security, variety, and the daily shape of the job

You care about the concrete terms of the work: what it pays, how secure it is, how varied the days are, how busy you are kept, and whether you work alongside people or on your own.

What each value is measured by

The six work values, the specific needs the instrument measures under each, and what to look for when you are researching a real job. Occupations in the O*NET database carry their own ratings on the same six values.

Work valueAlso calledNeeds measuredWhat to look for in a job
AchievementDoing work you are good atAbility Utilization · AchievementThe role uses skills you already have, rather than mostly coordination or waiting.
IndependenceDeciding how the work gets doneCreativity · Responsibility · AutonomyDecisions about how to do the work sit with the person doing it.
RecognitionAdvancement, standing, and creditAdvancement · Recognition · AuthorityThere is a real ladder, and people visibly climb it.
RelationshipsColleagues, service, and staying straightCo-workers · Social Service · Moral ValuesThe people you would work with day to day are ones you would choose.
SupportManagement that backs you upCompany Policies and Practices · Supervision, Human Relations · Supervision, TechnicalTraining is scheduled and budgeted, not improvised.
Working ConditionsPay, security, variety, and the daily shape of the jobActivity · Independence · Variety · Compensation · Security · Working ConditionsPay compares well with what the same work earns elsewhere.

Why you have to rank instead of rate

Most online tests would ask you to rate each statement from "not important" to "very important". That does not work here. Asked in isolation, almost everyone says almost everything about a job is important — fair pay, good colleagues, decent management, work that means something — and six near-identical high scores tell you nothing about what you would actually give up.

So the instrument makes you sort the cards into five columns of exactly four. You cannot put everything at the top. That constraint is the measurement, and it is why the result is worth something — but it also means the scores are ipsative: they rank your values against each other and against nothing else. There is no percentile here, and there cannot be one.

About this test

The twenty card statements and the scoring are the O*NET Work Importance Locator, built by the National Center for O*NET Development for the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). The sorting board is ours, built under the O*NET Tools Developer License. Northstarself has modified this tool; USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested the modification.

USDOL/ETA retired the Work Importance Locator in June 2024 and now archives its materials as-is. The occupation-side work-value ratings your result is matched against are a separate, still-maintained part of the O*NET Database. In its own validation, the instrument identified a person's single highest work value consistently across a two-month retest 62% of the time, and its User's Guide states it should not be used to establish the rank order of all six values — so this site leads with your top two and says plainly that the middle of the ranking is soft.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Work values questions, answered

What is the difference between work values and career interests?

Interests are about what you like doing; values are about what you need from the job in return. Someone can find the work itself genuinely interesting and still leave because the pay, the manager, or the lack of autonomy made it untenable. The two are measured separately here because they answer different questions and neither substitutes for the other.

Why do I have to put exactly four cards in each column?

Because otherwise the result measures nothing. Asked how important something is, almost everyone says almost everything is important, and six near-identical high scores tell you nothing about what you would actually trade away. Forcing the distribution is what makes the ranking readable — it is the design of the instrument, not a limitation of this website.

Can I compare my scores to other people's?

No, and that is not a missing feature. Because every card you push up forces another one down, these scores are ipsative: they rank your six values against each other only. A high Support score means you placed it above your own other values, not that you value support more than the average person. No percentile or population comparison can be derived from this test.

How reliable is this result?

Moderately, for the top of your list only. In the publisher's own study, 230 students took the instrument twice two months apart: their highest work value was the same both times 62% of the time, but the correlations for the individual six scores ran only .35 to .58. The User's Guide concludes that the instrument supports identifying your highest work value and should not be used to determine the rank order of all six. Read the top of your list as a signal and the middle of it as noise.

Should employers use this to screen candidates?

No. The instrument's own publisher states that results should be used for career exploration and counselling, and must not be used as part of a screening process for jobs or training. That applies to this implementation too.

The O*NET Work Importance Locator was retired. Is this result still meaningful?

The U.S. Department of Labor retired the tool in June 2024 and now archives its materials as-is, without technical support. What was retired is the questionnaire; the occupation-side work-value ratings this page matches you against are part of the current O*NET Database and are still published. Treat the ranking as a well-documented reflection exercise with a known scoring method rather than a currently supported government assessment.

SOURCES

Where this test comes from

  1. [1]
    O*NET Work Importance Locator — instrument and Work Value Cards, National Center for O*NET Development, U.S. Department of Labor

    The twenty card statements and the forced-distribution scoring administered here, reproduced from the published instrument. USDOL/ETA retired the tool on 3 June 2024; these materials are the official archive and are provided as-is.

  2. [2]
    O*NET Work Importance Locator User's Guide — scoring key, multipliers, and reliability evidence

    The source of the card-to-value mapping and the multipliers that put all six values on a common 6–30 scale. It also reports the instrument's own validation: over a two-month interval the top-ranked value repeated 62% of the time, but per-value correlations ran only .35 (Achievement) to .58 (Support). The guide's own conclusion is that the WIL supports identifying a person's highest work value and 'should not be used by clients to determine the rank order or profile of all six'. This result page says the same thing.

  3. [3]
    O*NET Career Exploration Tools Content License

    The licence this implementation is built under. The web card-sorting board is an adaptation, so it falls under the O*NET Tools Developer License rather than the no-derivatives option. Northstarself has modified this tool; USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested the modification.

  4. [4]
    O*NET Database — Work Values file (occupation-side ratings)

    How much each occupation typically reinforces each of the six values, used for the occupation matches. This is database content under CC BY 4.0 — a different licence from the instrument above — and unlike the questionnaire it is still maintained.