RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION · COUPLES SATISFACTION INDEX (CSI-16)

Relationship satisfaction: what the Couples Satisfaction Index measures

How the Couples Satisfaction Index measures relationship satisfaction, what the 51.5 line means, what one person's score cannot see, and what to do with a low score.

· 2 min read

"How happy are you in your relationship?" is a simple question with a messy answer. The Couples Satisfaction Index was built to ask it as precisely as possible.

This guide explains how the CSI was made, how our relationship satisfaction test scores it, and how to read the result without over-reading it.

QUICK DEFINITION

The Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI) measures overall satisfaction with a romantic relationship. Funk and Rogge built it in 2007 with item response theory, keeping the most precise items from established measures such as the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. This test uses the 16-item version: one score from 0 to 81, where scores below 51.5 suggest notable relationship dissatisfaction.

How the CSI was built

In 2007 Funk and Rogge pooled the items of the established satisfaction measures — including the Dyadic Adjustment Scale and the Marital Adjustment Test — and used item response theory to keep the ones that measured satisfaction most precisely. The result comes in 32-, 16-, 8-, and 4-item versions; we use the 16-item one.

It measures one thing: overall satisfaction with the relationship. The different question formats — a happiness rating, true-or-not statements, and adjective pairs such as sturdy or fragile — are different ways of asking, scored as one total.

What the score means

Answers are summed to a score from 0 to 81. The authors give one line: scores below 51.5 suggest notable relationship dissatisfaction. They give no other bands, so neither do we. A total a few answers from the line — 49 to 54 — is reported as close to it rather than on one side.

What one person's score cannot see

Your score is your view of the relationship on the day you answered. It does not include your partner's view, it does not say why you feel the way you do, and it does not ask about safety. If you are afraid of your partner, or controlled in who you see or how you spend money, that is not a satisfaction problem — contact a local domestic-abuse helpline.

If your score is low

A low score is a reason to talk, not a verdict. Low scores come from very different places — a hard season, one unresolved conflict, a slow drift — and only the two of you can tell which. If it stays below the line, couples therapy or a structured relationship-education programme is a common and sensible step. For the patterns underneath, the attachment styles guide is a useful companion.

TRY IT YOURSELF

Take the free Relationship Satisfaction test

16 questions, about 3 min. No sign-up — your answers stay on your device.

Start the test →

This guide is for self-reflection and general education. It is not medical, psychological, or career advice, and no questionnaire here is a diagnosis.

Keep reading

← All guides

SOURCES

Where the facts in this guide come from

  1. [1]
    Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. ↗

    The validation paper: the item pool, the item response theory selection, and the evidence that the CSI measures satisfaction more precisely than the scales it was built from.

  2. [2]
    Rogge lab, University of Rochester — Self-report scales developed by the Rogge lab (CSI-16 form) ↗

    The source of the sixteen items, response options, point values, scoring rule, and the 51.5 interpretation line, reproduced from the form. The lab distributes the CSI as freely available for research and clinical use; the form does not state terms for commercial use.

  3. [3]
    Early Intervention Foundation (2020, rev. 2024). Measure report: Couples Satisfaction Index (CSI-16). Foundations. ↗

    An independent evidence review, and the source of the validation-sample description quoted on the result page (5,315 people, mostly in the USA). It also notes that no test-retest reliability has been published, which is why the result has no likely range.