MORAL FOUNDATIONS · MFQ-2

Free Moral Foundations Test (MFQ-2)

Which moral concerns weigh most in your judgments: care, equality, proportionality, loyalty, authority, and purity. 36 statements, about 6 minutes, compared with nationally stratified samples from 19 countries.

What moral foundations are

Moral foundations theory holds that people build their moral judgments on several distinct intuitions. The Moral Foundations Questionnaire-2 (Atari et al., 2023) measures six: Care, Equality, Proportionality, Loyalty, Authority, and Purity, with six statements each. It splits the original fairness foundation into equality of outcomes and rewards proportional to contribution.

Two people can agree on every fact and still disagree about what is right, because each weighs a different concern. The six foundations name those concerns, so a disagreement can be read as a difference in emphasis rather than as one side not caring about morality.

The six foundations

Care

About concern for people who are suffering and for kindness and compassion. Higher scorers treat compassion for people who are suffering as close to the centre of morality.

Equality

About fairness as equal outcomes — that resources and rewards should be shared evenly. Higher scorers see unequal outcomes, especially in money, as a moral problem in themselves.

Proportionality

About fairness as deserving — that rewards should match effort and contribution. Higher scorers want rewards to track effort and merit, and cheating to be caught.

Loyalty

About standing with your group — country, community, or team. Higher scorers treat loyalty to their country, community, or team as a moral duty.

Authority

About respect for tradition, elders, and legitimate leadership. Higher scorers value tradition, respect for elders and parents, and strong leadership as part of a good society.

Purity

About the sense that some things are sacred and that bodies and conduct can be degraded. Higher scorers feel that some things are sacred and that chastity and restraint matter morally.

Two kinds of fairness

The first questionnaire had one fairness foundation. The MFQ-2 splits it into Equality, fairness as equal outcomes, and Proportionality, fairness as rewards that match contribution. Across 19 countries the two correlated only .21 on average, so many people value one much more than the other.

Compared across 19 countries

Your scores are placed against 3,902 adults in nationally stratified samples from 19 countries, about 205 each (Atari et al., 2023, Study 2), pooled with equal weight, and against the range of the 19 national averages. Those averages differ a lot: Purity varied most with cultural distance from the United States (r = .43). The result never gives a percentile, because the paper reports means and standard deviations, not distributions.

Not a political label

Research finds that, on average, people who call themselves more liberal score higher on Care and Equality and those who call themselves more conservative higher on Loyalty, Authority, Purity, and Proportionality. Those are averages across many people. This test does not guess anyone's politics, religion, or country, and no foundation is the nobler one to score high on.

What is free and what the report adds

The two foundations you weigh most, the methodology, and the sources are free. The advanced report adds the other four foundations, your full order and which gaps are real, a reading of your two kinds of fairness, where your scores sit among 19 national averages, a 90-day practice, and an AI reflection module.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Moral foundations questions, answered

What are the six moral foundations?

Care (concern for people who are suffering), Equality (fairness as equal outcomes), Proportionality (fairness as rewards that match contribution), Loyalty (standing with your country, community, or team), Authority (respect for tradition, elders, and leadership), and Purity (the sense that some things are sacred). Each is measured by six statements.

How is the MFQ-2 different from the original questionnaire?

It has new items written and tested across 25 populations, and it splits the original fairness foundation into two — Equality and Proportionality — which correlated only .21 on average across 19 countries. Its scores are therefore not directly comparable with the first questionnaire's.

Does my result show whether I am liberal or conservative?

No. Research finds group-level differences — on average, people who describe themselves as more liberal score higher on Care and Equality, and those who describe themselves as more conservative higher on Loyalty, Authority, Purity, and Proportionality — but these are averages across many people. Your scores describe which concerns weigh in your judgments, not your politics, and the result never labels anyone.

What are my scores compared with?

With 3,902 adults in nationally stratified samples from 19 countries, about 205 each, surveyed in 2021. Their means and standard deviations are pooled with equal weight, and the result says whether each score is above, around, or below that pooled mean and how many of the 19 national averages it exceeds. It gives no percentile, because a mean and a standard deviation are not a distribution.

Is a high score better?

No. A higher score means a concern weighs more in your moral judgments, not that you are more moral. People who weigh different foundations often disagree because each sees a different concern at stake, which is why the report focuses on understanding the foundations you weigh least.

Is the Chinese version the same test?

It uses the authors' own Chinese translation, which adapts a few items — for example, to country and family where the English says community and sports team. Scores are close to the English version's but not strictly interchangeable, and the reference samples include none from China.

SOURCES

Where this test comes from

  1. [1]
    Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2023). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(5), 1157–1188. ↗

    The instrument. The source of the six foundations, the scoring rule, the national means and SDs the result is placed against (Study 2, Table 7), the omega reliabilities behind every likely range, and the findings quoted in the report.

  2. [2]
    Atari, M., et al. (2022). Morality beyond the WEIRD [Preprint, revision 2, 2023]. PsyArXiv. ↗

    Open access under CC BY 4.0. Its appendix is the source of the 36 items, their order, the response options and the scoring key, reproduced verbatim.

  3. [3]
    MFQ-2 project materials, translations and data (Open Science Framework) ↗

    Released under CC BY 4.0, which permits use with attribution. The Chinese items are the authors' Chinese translation from this project, used verbatim.

  4. [4]
    Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. ↗

    The original study of moral foundations and political orientation, cited for background only. Group-level differences there are not used to label anyone.