MORAL FOUNDATIONS · MORAL FOUNDATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE-2 (MFQ-2)

Moral foundations: the six concerns behind your sense of right and wrong

What the six moral foundations of the MFQ-2 measure, why fairness is now two foundations, and why a moral foundations score is not a political label.

· 2 min read

Most moral disagreements are not about facts. Two people can agree on what happened and still disagree about whether it was wrong, because each weighs a different concern. Moral foundations theory tries to name those concerns.

This guide explains the six foundations, what changed in the second version of the questionnaire, and how our moral foundations test compares your scores with samples from 19 countries.

QUICK DEFINITION

Moral foundations theory holds that people build their moral judgments on several distinct intuitions. The Moral Foundations Questionnaire-2 (Atari et al., 2023) measures six: Care, Equality, Proportionality, Loyalty, Authority, and Purity, with six statements each. It splits the original fairness foundation into equality of outcomes and rewards proportional to contribution.

The six foundations

The Moral Foundations Questionnaire-2 (Atari et al., 2023) measures six foundations with six statements each, rated from "does not describe me at all" to "describes me extremely well".

  • ✦Care: concern for people who are suffering, and for kindness and compassion.
  • ✦Equality: fairness as equal outcomes.
  • ✦Proportionality: fairness as rewards that match effort and contribution.
  • ✦Loyalty: standing with your country, community, or team.
  • ✦Authority: respect for tradition, elders, and leadership.
  • ✦Purity: the sense that some things are sacred and can be degraded.

Fairness is now two foundations

The first questionnaire had a single fairness foundation. The MFQ-2 splits it into Equality and Proportionality, and across 19 countries the two correlated only .21 on average. Someone can care a great deal about equal shares and little about deserved shares, or the reverse — two different ideas of what fair means.

Scores differ across countries

The authors surveyed nationally stratified samples in 19 countries, about 205 adults each. National averages varied a lot, and Purity varied most with cultural distance from the United States: less Western, educated, industrialised, rich, and democratic populations endorsed it substantially more. The older grouping of foundations into "individualizing" and "binding" sets held in American data but not everywhere, which is why our report keeps all six separate.

Not a political label

Moral foundations became known through research on politics: on average, people who call themselves more liberal score higher on Care and Equality, and those who call themselves more conservative higher on Loyalty, Authority, Purity, and Proportionality. These are averages across many people. A single person's scores do not reveal their politics, and no foundation is the nobler one to score high on.

How our test measures it

We administer the 36 MFQ-2 items verbatim from the authors' materials, released under CC BY 4.0, and the Chinese version uses the authors' own translation. Each foundation is the mean of its six items. Your scores are compared with the 19 national samples pooled with equal weight, and with the range of their national averages — never as a percentile. The free result shows the two foundations you weigh most.

TRY IT YOURSELF

Take the free Moral Foundations test

36 statements, about 6 min. No sign-up — your answers stay on your device.

Start the test →

This guide is for self-reflection and general education. It is not medical, psychological, or career advice, and no questionnaire here is a diagnosis.

Keep reading

← All guides

SOURCES

Where the facts in this guide come from

  1. [1]
    Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2023). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(5), 1157–1188. ↗

    The instrument. The source of the six foundations, the scoring rule, the national means and SDs the result is placed against (Study 2, Table 7), the omega reliabilities behind every likely range, and the findings quoted in the report.

  2. [2]
    Atari, M., et al. (2022). Morality beyond the WEIRD [Preprint, revision 2, 2023]. PsyArXiv. ↗

    Open access under CC BY 4.0. Its appendix is the source of the 36 items, their order, the response options and the scoring key, reproduced verbatim.

  3. [3]
    MFQ-2 project materials, translations and data (Open Science Framework) ↗

    Released under CC BY 4.0, which permits use with attribution. The Chinese items are the authors' Chinese translation from this project, used verbatim.

  4. [4]
    Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046. ↗

    The original study of moral foundations and political orientation, cited for background only. Group-level differences there are not used to label anyone.