Northstarself
SELF-COMPASSION · NEFF SELF-COMPASSION SCALE

Self-compassion: how you treat yourself when things go wrong

Kristin Neff's six components of self-compassion, how it differs from self-esteem, what counts as a high or low score, and the evidence that self-compassion can be learned.

· 2 min read

You would probably never talk to a friend the way you talk to yourself after a mistake. Self-compassion is the research term for closing that gap — treating yourself with the kindness you would offer someone you care about.

This guide explains the idea, how our self-compassion test measures it, and how to read your score as a starting point.

QUICK DEFINITION

A self-compassion test measures how a person typically treats themselves in difficult times. This test administers Kristin Neff's 26-item Self-Compassion Scale (2003), which scores six components: self-kindness, common humanity, and mindfulness, and the reverse of their opposites — self-judgment, isolation, and over-identification. The total is the mean of the six. Self-compassion is distinct from self-esteem, and the scale has no clinical norms.

Three components and their opposites

Kristin Neff's 26-item Self-Compassion Scale (2003) measures six components: three compassionate ones and the reverse of three uncompassionate ones.

  • ✦Self-kindness, versus self-judgment.
  • ✦Common humanity — seeing struggle as part of being human — versus isolation.
  • ✦Mindfulness — holding pain in balance — versus over-identification with it.

Not the same as self-esteem

Self-esteem is a judgement of your own worth, and it tends to rise and fall with success and comparison. Self-compassion does not require a positive judgement at all: it is how you treat yourself when the judgement is bad. That is why it is often described as steadier than self-esteem.

Reading your score

The scale has no clinical norms, and its author says so. She offers a rough guide: totals in US samples sit close to 3.0, so 2.4 or below can be considered low, 3.6 or above high, and anything in between average. The result uses exactly those ranges and labels them as hers.

Some components read as "less self-judgment" or "less isolation" because those items are reversed before scoring, so every score points the same way: higher means more self-compassionate.

It can be learned

A meta-analysis of 27 randomised controlled trials found that self-compassion training changed all six components, alongside reductions in stress, depression, and anxiety. Your score describes a habit, not a fixed trait.

A low score is not a sign of depression, and this questionnaire does not diagnose anything. If things feel hard, that is worth talking to a doctor or therapist about, whatever your score. If work is part of the picture, see our burnout guide.

TRY IT YOURSELF

Take the free Self-Compassion test

26 questions, about 5 min. No sign-up — your answers stay on your device.

Start the test →

This guide is for self-reflection and general education. It is not medical, psychological, or career advice, and no questionnaire here is a diagnosis.

Keep reading

← All guides

SOURCES

Where the facts in this guide come from

  1. [1]
    Neff, K. D. (2003). Development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. ↗

    The paper that introduces the scale: its 26 items, six subscales, and the development samples, with a total-score alpha of .92 and subscale alphas of .75–.81.

  2. [2]
    Neff, K. D. Self-Compassion Scale (SCS): instrument, scoring key, and permission letter. ↗

    The form this implementation reproduces — items, stem, endpoint anchors, and scoring key — and the signed letter granting permission to use the scale for any purpose.

  3. [3]
    Neff, K. D., & Tóth-Király, I. (2022). Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). In O. N. Medvedev et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research. Springer. ↗

    The source of the ranges used for low, moderate, and high (2.4 and 3.6, from a typical mean near 3.0 and SD near 0.60 in US samples), of the advice to use a total score, and of why the 12-item short form's subscales are not reported.

  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Muris, P., & Petrocchi, N. (2017). Protection or vulnerability? A meta-analysis of the relations between the positive and negative components of self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 24(2), 373–383. ↗

    The other side of the debate the report describes: the uncompassionate components are more closely linked to psychopathology than the compassionate ones, and these authors argue they should be scored separately.

  6. [6]