Northstarself
WORK VALUES · O*NET WORK IMPORTANCE LOCATOR

Work values: what a job has to give you before it feels like a good one

The six O*NET work values, why work values differ from career interests, why the card sort forces trade-offs, and why only the top of your list is reliable.

· 2 min read

Plenty of people leave jobs they found genuinely interesting. The work was fine; the pay, the manager, or the lack of autonomy was not. That gap is what work values describe: not what you enjoy doing, but what a job has to give you in return.

Here is how our work values card sort works and how to read it honestly.

QUICK DEFINITION

Work values describe what a person needs from a job in order to find it satisfying, as distinct from what activities they enjoy. This test administers the O*NET Work Importance Locator, a twenty-card sort published by the U.S. Department of Labor, which ranks six work values: Achievement, Independence, Recognition, Relationships, Support, and Working Conditions. Its scores are ipsative — they rank a person's values against each other, not against other people.

The six values

The test administers the O*NET Work Importance Locator, a twenty-card sort published by the U.S. Department of Labor.

  • ✦Achievement: using your abilities and seeing results.
  • ✦Independence: working on your own initiative and making decisions.
  • ✦Recognition: advancement, prestige, and being noticed.
  • ✦Relationships: good co-workers and work that serves others.
  • ✦Support: a supportive employer and fair, competent management.
  • ✦Working Conditions: pay, security, and a good environment.

Why you must put exactly four cards in each column

Ask people how important things are and almost everyone says almost everything is important. Six near-identical high scores tell you nothing about what you would actually trade away. Forcing the distribution is what makes the ranking readable — it is the instrument's design, not a website limitation.

It also means scores are ipsative: they rank your values against each other only. A high Support score means you put it above your own other values, not that you value support more than the average person.

Read the top, not the middle

In the publisher's own study, students who took the sort twice two months apart got the same top value 62% of the time, but the individual scores were much less stable. The User's Guide concludes the tool supports identifying your highest value and should not be used to rank all six. Treat the top of your list as a signal and the middle as noise.

The questionnaire itself was retired by the Department of Labor in June 2024; the occupation-side work-value ratings we match you against are still part of the current O*NET Database.

Values plus interests

Interests tell you what work might hold your attention; values tell you what would make you stay. Pair this with your Holland Code — the site shows where the two occupation rankings overlap, side by side, without blending them into one score.

TRY IT YOURSELF

Take the free Work Values test

20 cards, about 6 min. No sign-up — your answers stay on your device.

Start the test →

This guide is for self-reflection and general education. It is not medical, psychological, or career advice, and no questionnaire here is a diagnosis.

Keep reading

← All guides

SOURCES

Where the facts in this guide come from

  1. [1]
    O*NET Work Importance Locator — instrument and Work Value Cards, National Center for O*NET Development, U.S. Department of Labor ↗

    The twenty card statements and the forced-distribution scoring administered here, reproduced from the published instrument. USDOL/ETA retired the tool on 3 June 2024; these materials are the official archive and are provided as-is.

  2. [2]
    O*NET Work Importance Locator User's Guide — scoring key, multipliers, and reliability evidence ↗

    The source of the card-to-value mapping and the multipliers that put all six values on a common 6–30 scale. It also reports the instrument's own validation: over a two-month interval the top-ranked value repeated 62% of the time, but per-value correlations ran only .35 (Achievement) to .58 (Support). The guide's own conclusion is that the WIL supports identifying a person's highest work value and 'should not be used by clients to determine the rank order or profile of all six'. This result page says the same thing.

  3. [3]
    O*NET Career Exploration Tools Content License ↗

    The licence this implementation is built under. The web card-sorting board is an adaptation, so it falls under the O*NET Tools Developer License rather than the no-derivatives option. Northstarself has modified this tool; USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested the modification.

  4. [4]
    O*NET Database — Work Values file (occupation-side ratings) ↗

    How much each occupation typically reinforces each of the six values, used for the occupation matches. This is database content under CC BY 4.0 — a different licence from the instrument above — and unlike the questionnaire it is still maintained.